Menu

The Takeaways from Molly Mae Hague and Tommy Fury’s Split

Molly Mae Hague and Tommy Fury’s recent separation has once again sparked discussions about cohabitation and the legal protections available to unmarried couples in the UK. Molly Mae and Tommy met on Love Island and have gone on to share a home and start a family. However, as with millions of couples across England and Wales, they are not legally married.

Unlike married couples, cohabiting partners in England and Wales do not have a legal duty to support each other financially should the relationship end, nor do they have an automatic right to each other’s pensions or inheritance, unless specified in a will. So, cohabiting partner’s claims against each other are limited to claims against real property, whether owned jointly or in one person’s sole name.

In this case, it has been reported that Molly Mae owned the family home in her sole name. It is not clear who contributed to the property, or whether Tommy took steps to protect his own interest in it.

What does that mean for Tommy?

As the property is owned in Molly Mae’s sole name, she will usually be considered the owner and sole beneficiary. Tommy would need to prove he has made significant contributions, either financially or in other ways, or it had always been the parties’ intention that he would have an interest in the property, if he is to be able to stake any claim against it.

Arguments such as those are complex, expensive to run, and often difficult to prove.

What could Tommy have done to protect his interest in the property?

Foremostly, Tommy could and should have taken legal advice from a specialist family lawyer.

In an ideal world, Tommy would have been made a joint owner of the property at the time of the purchase. However, if for any reason that was not possible, he could have instructed solicitors to prepare a deed of trust, protecting any contributions he made to the property and ensuring they are repaid to him as and when the property is sold.

The preferred method, however, would have been for the couple to enter into a cohabitation agreement, setting out how the various assets of the relationship are owned, and how they will be dealt with when the parties separate. It is understandable that a happy couple do not want to think about a relationship ending, but taking a pragmatic approach at the start of cohabitation can save a lot of time, money, and upset, if the worst happens. 

What about Bambi?

If Bambi is to live with Molly Mae, then Molly Mae could apply to the court for financial provision from Tommy, for Bambi’s benefit. She could ask the court to make orders such as top-up orders for child maintenance, and lump sum payments to provide for Bambi’s capital needs.

How can we help?

If you find yourself in a similar situation to Molly Mae or Tommy, our specialist team of family solicitors can assist you in understanding what, if any, claim you may have against the other person and help you to resolve the matter as quickly and amicably as ever possible.

Call us on 0116 212 1000 to speak with a member of the team or visit our website for more information.

The Modern Family: Understanding the Legal Rights of Transgender Parents in the UK

In the UK, the number of transgender adults is estimated to range from approximately 200,000 to 300,000 individuals, with around 24% to 49% of them thought to be parents.

In recent years, the legal rights of transgender individuals have gained significant recognition and protection in the UK. However, when it comes to transgender parents, the legal framework can be complex, often navigating through areas of family law, gender recognition, and parental responsibilities. This article explores the rights and challenges faced by transgender parents in the UK, providing an overview of the relevant laws and legal precedents.

Gender Recognition

One of the key legal developments for transgender individuals in the UK is the Gender Recognition Act 2004. This law allows transgender people to obtain a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC), legally recognising their gender as male or female. With a GRC, a person can update their birth certificate and enjoy the same rights as a cisgender person of their acquired gender.

However, the question of parental status is more complex. If a transgender person has children prior to transitioning, their legal status as a mother or father is not altered by acquiring a GRC. For instance, a transgender woman who gave birth to a child before transitioning would still be listed as the child’s father on legal documents, even after obtaining a GRC. Similarly, a transgender man who gave birth would be listed as the mother, despite his gender identity. This can create challenges, particularly for the transgender parent, who may wish for legal documents to reflect their current gender.

The courts in the UK have upheld this approach, emphasising that parental status is defined by the biological role in the child’s birth rather than the parent’s gender identity at the time of the child’s upbringing.

Parental Rights

In cases where transgender parents are involved in disputes regarding child arrangements, UK family courts operate under the principle that the child’s best interests are paramount. The fact that a parent is transgender does not, by itself, affect their parental rights or responsibilities. Judges consider factors such as the child’s welfare, emotional stability, and the ability of both parents to provide care.

However, transgender parents may still face societal prejudices or emotional challenges when navigating children disputes. In some cases, there may be concerns from the other parent or family members about how a gender transition might impact the child. Courts tend to dismiss unfounded concerns based on prejudice, focusing instead on evidence of the parent’s ability to maintain a stable and loving environment for the child.

Surrogacy, Adoption, and Assisted Reproduction

For transgender people seeking to become parents after transitioning, UK law provides avenues for parenthood through adoption, surrogacy, or assisted reproduction.

Surrogacy:

In the case of surrogacy, both cisgender and transgender parents can apply for a parental order, which transfers legal parenthood from the surrogate to the intended parents. UK law does not discriminate against transgender people in surrogacy arrangements, but they must follow the legal process to secure parental rights.

Adoption:

Similarly, adoption law in the UK allows transgender individuals or couples to adopt children. Since the Adoption and Children Act 2002, transgender individuals have had the right to adopt, provided they meet the same criteria as any other prospective adoptive parent. The focus remains on the prospective parent’s ability to provide a loving and supportive home for the child, regardless of gender identity.

Assisted Reproduction:

Transgender individuals can also become parents through assisted reproduction, such as sperm or egg donation. However, current UK law does not allow a transgender person who has given birth to be legally recognised as anything other than the child’s mother, even if they transitioned before giving birth.

Equality Act 2010

Transgender parents are protected under the Equality Act 2010, which makes it unlawful to discriminate against someone based on their gender reassignment. This protection extends to parenting, meaning schools, healthcare providers, and other public services must not treat transgender parents differently. If a transgender parent feels they are being treated unfairly due to their gender identity, they can seek legal redress under the Equality Act.

Legal Precedents and Evolving Case Law

Several UK court cases have dealt with the rights of transgender parents, offering further clarity. In J v B (Ultra-Orthodox Judaism Transgender) [2017], a case involving a transgender father and Orthodox Jewish community, the court ruled in favour of maintaining contact between the father and his children, emphasising the importance of the child’s welfare over the religious objections raised by the community. The ruling highlighted that the transgender parent’s right to family life should be respected and weighed against any societal or community concerns.

Conclusions

The UK legal system continues to evolve in response to transgender rights, with courts generally favouring a progressive approach that balances the rights of transgender parents with the best interests of their children.

Family courts have consistently affirmed the right of transgender parents to maintain relationships with their children, provided this is in the best interests of the child.

The evolving legal landscape reflects a growing awareness of transgender rights, but further reform may be necessary to address ongoing challenges. Ensuring that all parents, regardless of gender identity, are able to enjoy full legal recognition and protection remains an ongoing priority for advocates of equality in the UK.

All solicitors in the Family Department are approachable and knowledgeable. We are all here to help and assist you. Contact Us

Collapse of ISG sparks concern across construction sector

Last week, administrators confirmed that construction giant ISG had ceased trading with the immediate closure of all its sites and the loss of 2400 jobs.

ISG Ltd is a privately owned construction company. By turnover, it was the sixth biggest contractor in the UK having worked on large government projects including the building and refurbishments of prisons and schools.

Staff were notified of their job loss by email following the leaked media reports that ISG had filed for administration on Friday.

Aside from the impact this will have on many government projects, including the expansion plans underway for many prisons and schools, the announcement left many shocked and questioning how a company that is understood to have held £1.84 billion of government contracts could have been allowed to fall into financial collapse.

It has sparked a wave of concern that other chain partners may fold in the wake of ISG’s demise with industry experts reporting that, “most of the industry is sailing dangerously close to the wind.”

It seems not that long ago (although I am reliably told this was 2018) that we were asking similar questions in the wake of the collapse of Carillion. At that time, I provided advise to trade unions and their members and pursued claims for many employees who lost their jobs in almost identical circumstances. Why were lessons not learnt? The construction sector has been besieged by problems for a long time. Brexit reduced labour availability. Covid and the Ukraine war reduced material availability. This served to increase overheads and eroded profit margins.

ISG’s demise was the result of legacy issues. It could not be said to have come as a  surprise. Staff should not have learned of their dismissal by email and with prior notice or consultation.

As an employment lawyer it seems inevitable that claims of unfair dismissal and protective awards, where the employer has failed to follow a fair dismissal procedure and comply with statutory obligations to collectively consult with its workforce, will follow. The ‘tab’ for which will fall on an already restrained public purse.

Large companies should be held to account. Questions should be asked of the government about how this was allowed to happen (again) and has prompted a call on the government to tighten rules on when business can continue to trade on very thin margins.

All this will be of little consolation to those employees who have woken this morning with no job to go to and bills to pay. Thankfully, the law does provide some limited protection for affected employees. 

If you are affected by any of the employment law issues within this article, and find yourself dismissed with no notice or consultation, then you may have a claim you can pursue to an employment tribunal which may allow you to recover some compensation. However, these claims must be submitted in good time and so it is important that you seek timely advice.

At Lawson West Solicitors we have a team of experienced employment lawyers who can provide you with help and support.

Contact Us

kl
Kate Lea, Head of Employment Team
Lawson West Solicitors, Leicester

Why use a solicitor to make a Lasting Power of Attorney?

A Lasting Power of Attorney (LPA) is an important legal safeguard that ensures your affairs are managed according to your wishes if you become unable to make decisions due to illness, accident or diminished mental capacity.

While it is possible for you to create an LPA on your own, enlisting the expertise of a solicitor can make navigating the process much smoother and reassuring for you and your loved ones. Here are 5 benefits of using a solicitor to help make your LPA:

  1. Expert legal knowledge

The process of making an LPA involves technical details as well legal terminology which can get confusing.  Instead of getting bogged down in the legal jargon, a solicitor will help you navigate the forms, demystify the language and ensure that you fully understand the implications of the LPAs as well as your legal rights and responsibilities.  A solicitor will also ensure that the documents are prepared correctly which reduces the risk of them being rejected by the Office of the Public Guardian.

  1. Tailoring your LPA to your needs

There are two types of LPA that you can make – one that covers your Property and Financial Affairs and another that covers your Health and Welfare.

Not only can a solicitor help you understand the scope of both types of LPA, as well as help you tailor them to your specific needs and requirements, they can advise you on the possible implications of your choices and ensure that your LPA works for you in the way that you want.

  1. Help avoid family disputes

One of the biggest concerns we see when making an LPA is the potential for family disagreements over how your affairs should be handled. If this is something you are concerned about then a solicitor will be able to advise on how to choose a suitable Attorney as well as formalise your wishes in a legally binding way which could reduce the risk of any future misunderstandings or disputes.  

  1. Mitigating the risk of fraud or abuse

An LPA can give an Attorney a lot of power and control over your affairs, so it is imperative that the documents are prepared without any mistakes or ambiguities that would leave them open to fraud or abuse.  Sadly, there have been cases where attorneys have abused the powers given to them by an LPA to benefit themselves, but by using a solicitor to prepare your LPAs, you add an extra layer of protection as they can advise on ways to mitigate these types of risk.

  1. Guidance on Registration

Before the LPAs can be used, they must be registered with the Office of the Public Guardian (OPG). A solicitor will make sure the LPAs are submitted correctly and will answer any queries the OPG may have.  If there are any delays or problems, a solicitor will deal with the OPG directly, so that you do not have to.

Speaking with one of our qualified solicitors will ensure your LPA is prepared correctly, in accordance with your wishes and importantly, take the hassle away from you and your loved ones.

If you need assistance, please give our friendly team a call on 0116 212 1000 or 01858 445 480 or complete our Contact Us form.