Menu

‘McClure Family Protection Trusts’: Good or Bad?

What to do with my McClure Family Protection Trust in England?

In 2021, McClure Solicitors ceased trading and were subsequently acquired by another firm.

Following the firm’s closure, it became apparent that hundreds or thousands of “family protection trusts” were set up by McClure. These trusts would often be set up by spouses, with each spouse placing their half of their property into a trust.

Unfortunately, it has since become clear that many of these trusts either were not suitable at the outset, or circumstances have since changed and mean that the trusts no longer work as intended. Another issue is that on many of these trusts, the Trustees include previous partners or directors of McClure meaning that additional paperwork is required to sell a house, for example.

At Lawson West, we have helped a number of families with problematic McClure Family Protection Trusts over the past couple of years.

What is the problem?

Over the years, we have seen an increase in the public awareness of the cost of care and increasing inheritance tax bills. Unfortunately, this increased knowledge leads to increased fear, and we often see people taking steps to try and make things easier for their loved ones in the event that they lose capacity or leave an inheritance tax bill behind, often at a great expense.

“Family protection trusts” are typically advertised as a way of avoiding inheritance tax and/or care fees, depending on the circumstances in which they are set up (and the timing).

Unfortunately, these trusts are not always suitable, and it takes experienced practitioners to be able to advise on the pros and cons, and come to a conclusion about whether or not this type of trust is suitable for a particular person.

Should I be worried?

If you set up a family protection trust, whether with McClure or otherwise, then it is always worth reviewing the document to make sure that it is still suitable. Better yet, seek professional advice if your circumstances change significantly.

If a person loses capacity or passes away with one of these trusts in place, it can make things a bit more difficult. If you find out that a loved one has put one of these trusts in place, it is even more important that you approach someone who has detailed knowledge of trusts to get advice.

When is this type of trust suitable?

At Lawson West we generally advise against this type of trust, except in very limited circumstances.

Most people can pass on £325,000 to their loved ones when they pass away. In some cases, this goes up to £500,000, meaning that a couple could leave up to £1m to their children/grandchildren when they die. In our experience, this means that the majority of people living in Leicestershire will never pay inheritance tax.

Local authorities know that people want to avoid paying care fees and so they can simply ignore any gifts or transfers into trust where the sole or main purpose was to avoid having to pay for care. This means that trusts, or outright gifts, often do not help a person to avoid having to pay for their care (if required).

How can Lawson West help?

Most importantly, we have experience in dealing with these trusts set up by McClure. This means that we know what the documents look like, the typical wording involved, and we have contact with the ex-directors of McClure who are often appointed as co-Trustees. This means that we can deal with your matter quickly and efficiently, keeping costs at a minimum.

Our team has over 80 years of experience combined and include two full members of the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners (STEP). That means you are in safe hands when discussing your matter with us, whether trust-related or otherwise.

If you want to speak to us about your situation, please give our friendly team a call on 0116 212 1000 or 01858 445 480 or complete our Contact Us form.

Please note that we can only offer advice regarding English trusts, not those set up in Scotland.

Are you an Employer? Do you know the new 2024 Employment Law changes?

This year (2024) is to be a significant one with some key changes and reforms within the workplace which impact on individuals and businesses alike. There is also the potential for radical changes if the Labour government comes to power!

National Minimum Wage

The national living wage is increasing to £10.42 an hour to £11.44 an hour giving a boost of £1,800 for full-time workers over the age of 21. National Minimum wage for younger workers aged 18 -20 will also increase to £8.60 an hour – a £1.11 hourly pay rise. The eligibility for the national living wage will also be extended by reducing the age threshold from 23 to 21. In addition National Insurance has been cut from 12% to 10%. This will save those on an average salary of £35,000 over £450 a year.

Employment Relations (Flexible Working) Act 2023 – 6th April 2024

The Employment Relations (Flexible Working) Act 2023 is also to come into force on 6 April 2024. These regulations will remove the current 26-week minimum period of service for employees to make a request for flexible working, meaning that it will become a ‘day one’ right with effect from 6 April 2024.

  • Employees will be able to make two flexible working requests (rather than just one as at present) in any 12-month period. Only one request can be in progress at any time.

  • Employers will be required to ‘consult’ with employees before rejecting any request, although the Act does not include any details of what the consultation process should be.

  • Employees will no longer be required, as at present, to identify the effects of the proposed change and suggest how the employer might deal with them.

  • Employers will be required to respond to a request within two months rather than three months as currently applies, subject to an agreed extension.

A new ACAS Code of Practice on handling flexible working requests is also due to be approved shortly.

As an employer you must ensure that your current policies are reviewed and updated. In addition mangers should be given appropriate training in order to handle such requests.

Carers Leave Act – 6th April 2024

Employees will have a new statutory right to take one week of unpaid leave per year to provide or arrange care for a dependant with a long-term care need.

These new regulations are expected to apply from 6 April 2024 and details are set out in The Carer’s Leave Regulations 2024 which have been published in draft form.

Who is entitled to carer’s leave?

This will be a right afforded to all employees who meet the eligibility requirements and is a “day one” right meaning it does not require a particular length of service. To be eligible for carer’s leave, an employee must:

  • have a dependant with a long-term care need;

  • want to be absent from work to provide or arrange care for that dependant; and

  • not have exceeded their entitlement of one week of carer’s leave in the relevant 12-month period.

A person is a “dependant” of an employee if they (i) are a spouse, civil partner, child or parent of the employee; (ii) live in the same household as the employee, otherwise than by reason of being the employee’s boarder, employee, lodger or tenant, or; (iii) reasonably rely on the employee to provide or arrange care.

A “long-term care need” is defined as an illness or injury (whether physical or mental) that requires, or is likely to require, care for more than three months; a disability under the Equality Act 2010; or issues related to “old age”. The carer’s leave can be taken in half day or individual day increments up to one continuous week in a 12-month period. The leave does not need to be taken on consecutive days.

What are the steps for employees and employers?

The employee has to give notice to their employer before they can take carer’s leave. The employee must specify that they are entitled to this leave, the days or part days on which they intend to take it, and the dependant for whom they are providing or arranging care.

The employer cannot require the employee to supply evidence in relation to their request for carer’s leave before granting the leave. The required notice period is either twice as many days as the period of leave required, or three days, whichever is the greater.

Employers cannot decline a request, but can postpone the leave if all of the following circumstances apply:

  • If the employer reasonably considers that the operation of the business would be ‘unduly disrupted’.

  • The employer allows a period of carer’s leave to be taken by the employee of the same duration, within a month of the initial request.

  • The employer gives the employee written notice within seven days of the request, providing the reason for the postponement and confirming the agreed dates for the leave.

Protections:

The employee is protected from any detriment or dismissal by the employer because they took, sought to take, or made use of the benefits of carer’s leave, or because the employer believed that they were likely to take carer’s leave.

The regulations do not affect any contractual rights to carer’s leave that the employee may have, but the employee cannot exercise the statutory and contractual rights separately. The employee can take advantage of whichever right is more favourable in any particular respect.

What steps do you need to take?

This right is coming into play in April 2024, in the meantime employers should look at their current policies and consider creating or updating these to cover this new right. In addition managers should be provided to managers to handle such requests.

The Maternity Leave, Adoption Leave, and Shared Parental Leave (Amendment) Regulations 2024 – 6th April 2024

Draft regulations bringing into effect the extension to the existing period of redundancy protection applying to employees during family-related leave have also been laid before Parliament. Subject to parliamentary approval, these will take effect from 6 April 2024.

Currently, parents taking a period of maternity leave, adoption leave, or shared parental leave have the right to be offered any suitable alternative employment during a redundancy situation, in priority to any others at risk of redundancy.

As a result of the Protection from Redundancy (Pregnancy and Family Leave) Act 2023, this protection is extended to apply during pregnancy, and for a period of 18 months after birth or placement for adoption for those taking maternity, adoption or shared parental leave. This means that for an employee taking 12 months’ maternity leave, the protection will continue to apply for six months after their return to work.

Protection will cover a period of pregnancy, if the employer is informed of the pregnancy on or after 6 April 2024. It starts when the employee informs their employer about the pregnancy.

The protection will apply to maternity and adoption leave ending on or after 6 April 2024, and to shared parental leave starting on or after 6 April 2024. Note that for protection to apply after shared parental leave, there is a minimum threshold of six weeks’ continuous leave.

Employers will need to review their current policies and procedures in advance of April 2024 to ensure that they take account of these changes.

Paternity Leave Regulations – 6th April 2024

The government has now published draft legislation in the form of the Paternity Leave (Amendment) Regulations 2024.

These Regulations make the following changes:

  • employees will be able to take their two-week paternity leave entitlement as two separate one-week blocks rather than taking just one week in total or two consecutive weeks.

  • employees will be able to take paternity leave at any time in the 52 weeks after birth – rather than having to take leave in the 56 days following birth.

  • employees will only need to give 28 days’ notice of their intention to take paternity leave which is reduced from the previous position that required notice to be given 15 weeks before the Expected Week of Childbirth.

The Regulations are stated to apply in all cases where the EWC is on, or after, 6 April 2024. 

Employers should review existing policies so they are updated to reflective of the new changes. 

Employment (Allocation of Tips) Act – July 2024

Last year, the Employment (Allocation of Tips) Act 2023 was passed by parliament. Once this act is in force it will introduce a range of new measures, including a new duty on employers to ensure that all qualifying tips are allocated fairly between workers and a requirement for relevant employers to have a written policy on how they deal with tips.

To support employers with these measures, the Department for Business and Trade has now issued a draft statutory code of practice on the fair and transparent distribution of tips. The draft code includes guidance on what types of payment constitute qualifying tips and how an employer should choose the factors to determine the allocation and distribution of such tips. The consultation into the draft code will close on 22 February 2024. The government’s aim is for the final code and the full measures in the Act to come into force on 1 July 2024.

The Workers (Predictable Terms and Conditions) Act 2023 – predicated September 2024

This Act was was passed on 18 September 2023 and creates a new statutory right for workers on atypical contracts – such as agency workers, short fixed-term workers and those on zero-hours contracts – to request a more predictable working pattern. It is important for employers using these arrangements to be aware of the changes.

The Workers (Predictable Terms and Conditions) Act 2023

Although flexibility is a key characteristic of the UK labour market, the Act aims to address the issue of ‘one-sided flexibility’ whereby workers are not guaranteed work but are expected to be available at short notice with a lack of reciprocity.

The terms of the Act are summarised below, however the details will be published in due course via separate regulations. There is no date for implementation yet, but to give employers time to prepare for the changes the legislation is not expected to come into force until September 2024.

The new right is modelled on the current flexible working regime and will operate in a similar way. However, the right to request predictable working will not be a ‘day one right’ (as the right to request flexible working is set to become).

In what circumstances can workers request a more predictable working pattern?

Workers will have the right to make a request where:

  • There is a lack of predictability as regards any part of the work pattern (the work pattern being the number of working hours, days of the week and times on those days when the worker works, and the contract length);

  • The change relates to their work pattern; and

  • Their purpose in applying for the change is to get a more predictable work pattern.

Who can request predictable working?

The right extends to all workers and employees subject to a minimum service requirement. Although the length of this has not yet been specified, the government press release has indicated that it will be 26 weeks.

It is not expected that workers will need to have 26 weeks continuous employment, given the aim of the legislation is to improve unpredictable working patterns for atypical workers who are inherently unlikely to have continuous service with the same employer. However, workers need to have been employed by the same employer (whether or not under the same contract) at some point during the month immediately before the minimum service period, ending with the making of the application.

The new law will also apply to agency workers who, if they meet the qualifying conditions, will be able to apply to either the temporary work agency or the hirer to request a more predictable working pattern.

How can predictable working requests be made?

Workers can make a maximum of two applications in any 12-month period. The predictable working application must be (i) in writing; (ii) state that it is a statutory predictable working application; and (iii) specify the change applied for and the date on which it is proposed it should take effect.

If the agency worker is applying to a hirer, they should specify whether the application is for a contract of employment or for a worker’s contract. The Act provides some guidance on assessing this.

What about fixed term contracts?

The Act does not contain a definition of ‘predictability’. However, it does specify that fixed term contracts of 12 months or less will be presumed to lack predictability: anyone on such a contract will be able to request that the term is extended beyond 12 months or becomes permanent.

What does this mean for employers?

The process for dealing with requests reflects the existing flexible working regime. It is not a right to predictable working, it is a right to request predictable working and provided employers deal with the application within one month of receiving it, they are able to refuse the request for one (or more) of the following six grounds:

  • Burden of additional costs

  • Detrimental effect on ability to meet customer demand

  • Detrimental impact on the recruitment of staff

  • Detrimental impact on other aspects of the temporary work agency’s, hirer’s, or employer’s business

  • Insufficiency of work during the periods the worker or agency worker proposes to work

  • Planned structural changes

The government has highlighted the need for effective conversations between workers and employers about the reason(s) for rejecting a request.

Failing to deal with an application in a reasonable manner, or rejecting an application based on incorrect facts, will risk a claim based on procedural failings, Employees will have protection against automatic unfair dismissal, and both employees and workers protection from being subjected to a detriment, where they have made or propose to make an application for a more predictable work pattern. There could also be a risk of indirect discrimination claims if requests from certain disproportionately represented groups are routinely rejected (e.g. women, disabled people, young workers).

The Worker Protection (Amendment of Equality Act 2010) Act 2023 – expected October 2024

The Act introduces a new duty on employers to take reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment at work and it will take effect on 26 October 2024.

In summary, the Act introduces a new duty on employers to take reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment of their employees in the workplace and gives employment tribunals the power to provide an uplift of up to 25% in compensation when an employer has failed to take reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment.

Ahead of the new law becoming effective in October 2024, employers are advised to take proactive steps to ensure compliance. Relevant policies and procedures in relation to equal opportunities, harassment and bullying should be reviewed to ensure inclusion and explanation of the new rules.

Employers should also have in place a clear and secure process for employees to report harassment, and that those responsible for dealing with complaints are able to do so in a lawful and effective manner.

Other expected changes this year:

At some point during 2024, the government is expected to pass its Data Protection and Digital Information Bill, which aims to maintain data protection adequacy with the EU while relaxing a few areas that may benefit employers, including a less expansive definition of personal data and a new ability to ignore vexatious or excessive data subject access requests.

It is also expected that early this year we will receive the final version of the code of practice on ‘Fire & Rehire.’

How we can help…

2024 looks set to be a busy year from an employment law perspective. As ever, Lawson West Solicitors is here to help you navigate the compliance challenges thrown up by new legal developments.

Should you need assistance to update your current policies, questions or queries in relation to these upcoming changes or require training on the new changes then do please contact us.

Contact our experienced Employment Law Team on 0116 212 1000

Know your rights! Employment Law changes in 2024 for employees

2024 sees changes in the UK Employment Law – employees be sure to know your rights…

National Minimum Wage

The national living wage is increasing to £10.42 an hour to £11.44 an hour giving a boost of £1,800 for full-time workers over the age of 21. National Minimum wage for younger workers aged 18 -20 will also increase to £8.60 an hour – a £1.11 hourly pay rise. The eligibility for the national living wage will also be extended by reducing the age threshold from 23 to 21. In addition National Insurance has been cut from 12% to 10%. This will save those on an average salary of £35,000 over £450 a year.

If you believe that you are not being paid the correct rate of pay then Lawson West are able to guide you on what action you should take.

Employment Relations (Flexible Working) Act 2023 – 6th April 2024

The Employment Relations (Flexible Working) Act 2023 is also to come into force on 6 April 2024. These regulations will remove the current 26-week minimum period of service for employees to make a request for flexible working, meaning that it will become a ‘day one’ right with effect from 6 April 2024.

  • Employees will be able to make two flexible working requests (rather than just one as at present) in any 12-month period. Only one request can be in progress at any time.

  • Employers will be required to ‘consult’ with employees before rejecting any request, although the Act does not include any details of what the consultation process should be.

  • Employees will no longer be required, as at present, to identify the effects of the proposed change and suggest how the employer might deal with them.

  • Employers will be required to respond to a request within two months rather than three months as currently applies, subject to an agreed extension.

A new ACAS Code of Practice on handling flexible working requests is also due to be approved shortly.

If you would like guidance on how to make such a request or if you feel that your request has been unreasonably refused we are happy to assist.

Carers Leave Act – 6th April 2024

Employees will have a new statutory right to take one week of unpaid leave per year to provide or arrange care for a dependant with a long-term care need.

These new regulations are expected to apply from 6 April 2024 and details are set out in The Carer’s Leave Regulations 2024 which have been published in draft form.

Who is entitled to carer’s leave?

This will be a right afforded to all employees who meet the eligibility requirements and is a “day one” right meaning it does not require a particular length of service. To be eligible for carer’s leave, an employee must:

  • have a dependant with a long-term care need;

  • want to be absent from work to provide or arrange care for that dependant; and

  • not have exceeded their entitlement of one week of carer’s leave in the relevant 12-month period.

A person is a “dependant” of an employee if they (i) are a spouse, civil partner, child or parent of the employee; (ii) live in the same household as the employee, otherwise than by reason of being the employee’s boarder, employee, lodger or tenant, or; (iii) reasonably rely on the employee to provide or arrange care.

A “long-term care need” is defined as an illness or injury (whether physical or mental) that requires, or is likely to require, care for more than three months; a disability under the Equality Act 2010; or issues related to “old age”. The carer’s leave can be taken in half day or individual day increments up to one continuous week in a 12-month period. The leave does not need to be taken on consecutive days.

What are the steps for employees and employers?

The employee has to give notice to their employer before they can take carer’s leave. The employee must specify that they are entitled to this leave, the days or part days on which they intend to take it, and the dependant for whom they are providing or arranging care.

The employer cannot require the employee to supply evidence in relation to their request for carer’s leave before granting the leave. The required notice period is either twice as many days as the period of leave required, or three days, whichever is the greater.

Employers cannot decline a request, but can postpone the leave if all of the following circumstances apply:

  • If the employer reasonably considers that the operation of the business would be ‘unduly disrupted’.

  • The employer allows a period of carer’s leave to be taken by the employee of the same duration, within a month of the initial request.

  • The employer gives the employee written notice within seven days of the request, providing the reason for the postponement and confirming the agreed dates for the leave.

Protections:

The employee is protected from any detriment or dismissal by the employer because they took, sought to take, or made use of the benefits of carer’s leave, or because the employer believed that they were likely to take carer’s leave.

The regulations do not affect any contractual rights to carer’s leave that the employee may have, but the employee cannot exercise the statutory and contractual rights separately. The employee can take advantage of whichever right is more favourable in any particular respect.

The Maternity Leave, Adoption Leave, and Shared Parental Leave (Amendment) Regulations 2024 – 6th April 2024

Draft regulations bringing into effect the extension to the existing period of redundancy protection applying to employees during family-related leave have also been laid before Parliament. Subject to parliamentary approval, these will take effect from 6 April 2024.

Currently, parents taking a period of maternity leave, adoption leave, or shared parental leave have the right to be offered any suitable alternative employment during a redundancy situation, in priority to any others at risk of redundancy.

As a result of the Protection from Redundancy (Pregnancy and Family Leave) Act 2023, this protection is extended to apply during pregnancy, and for a period of 18 months after birth or placement for adoption for those taking maternity, adoption or shared parental leave. This means that for an employee taking 12 months’ maternity leave, the protection will continue to apply for six months after their return to work.

Protection will cover a period of pregnancy, if the employer is informed of the pregnancy on or after 6 April 2024. It starts when the employee informs their employer about the pregnancy.

The protection will apply to maternity and adoption leave ending on or after 6 April 2024, and to shared parental leave starting on or after 6 April 2024. Note that for protection to apply after shared parental leave, there is a minimum threshold of six weeks’ continuous leave.

Paternity Leave Regulations – 6th April 2024

The government has now published draft legislation in the form of the Paternity Leave (Amendment) Regulations 2024.

These Regulations make the following changes:

  • employees will be able to take their two-week paternity leave entitlement as two separate one-week blocks rather than taking just one week in total or two consecutive weeks.

  • employees will be able to take paternity leave at any time in the 52 weeks after birth – rather than having to take leave in the 56 days following birth.

  • employees will only need to give 28 days’ notice of their intention to take paternity leave which is reduced from the previous position that required notice to be given 15 weeks before the Expected Week of Childbirth.

The Regulations are stated to apply in all cases where the EWC is on, or after, 6 April 2024.  

Employment (Allocation of Tips) Act – July 2024

Last year, the Employment (Allocation of Tips) Act 2023 was passed by parliament. Once this act is in force it will introduce a range of new measures, including a new duty on employers to ensure that all qualifying tips are allocated fairly between workers and a requirement for relevant employers to have a written policy on how they deal with tips.
 
To support employers with these measures, the Department for Business and Trade has now issued a draft statutory code of practice on the fair and transparent distribution of tips. The draft code includes guidance on what types of payment constitute qualifying tips and how an employer should choose the factors to determine the allocation and distribution of such tips. The consultation into the draft code will close on 22 February 2024. The government’s aim is for the final code and the full measures in the Act to come into force on 1 July 2024.

The Workers (Predictable Terms and Conditions) Act 2023 – predicated September 2024

This Act was was passed on 18 September 2023 and creates a new statutory right for workers on atypical contracts – such as agency workers, short fixed-term workers and those on zero-hours contracts – to request a more predictable working pattern. It is important for employers using these arrangements to be aware of the changes.

The Workers (Predictable Terms and Conditions) Act 2023

Although flexibility is a key characteristic of the UK labour market, the Act aims to address the issue of ‘one-sided flexibility’ whereby workers are not guaranteed work but are expected to be available at short notice with a lack of reciprocity.

The terms of the Act are summarised below, however the details will be published in due course via separate regulations. There is no date for implementation yet, but to give employers time to prepare for the changes the legislation is not expected to come into force until September 2024.

The new right is modelled on the current flexible working regime and will operate in a similar way. However, the right to request predictable working will not be a ‘day one right’ (as the right to request flexible working is set to become).

In what circumstances can workers request a more predictable working pattern?

Workers will have the right to make a request where:

  • There is a lack of predictability as regards any part of the work pattern (the work pattern being the number of working hours, days of the week and times on those days when the worker works, and the contract length);

  • The change relates to their work pattern; and

  • Their purpose in applying for the change is to get a more predictable work pattern.

Who can request predictable working?

The right extends to all workers and employees subject to a minimum service requirement. Although the length of this has not yet been specified, the government press release has indicated that it will be 26 weeks.

It is not expected that workers will need to have 26 weeks continuous employment, given the aim of the legislation is to improve unpredictable working patterns for atypical workers who are inherently unlikely to have continuous service with the same employer. However, workers need to have been employed by the same employer (whether or not under the same contract) at some point during the month immediately before the minimum service period, ending with the making of the application.

The new law will also apply to agency workers who, if they meet the qualifying conditions, will be able to apply to either the temporary work agency or the hirer to request a more predictable working pattern.

How can predictable working requests be made?

Workers can make a maximum of two applications in any 12-month period. The predictable working application must be (i) in writing; (ii) state that it is a statutory predictable working application; and (iii) specify the change applied for and the date on which it is proposed it should take effect.

If the agency worker is applying to a hirer, they should specify whether the application is for a contract of employment or for a worker’s contract. The Act provides some guidance on assessing this.

What about fixed term contracts?

The Act does not contain a definition of ‘predictability’. However, it does specify that fixed term contracts of 12 months or less will be presumed to lack predictability: anyone on such a contract will be able to request that the term is extended beyond 12 months or becomes permanent.

How we can help…

The good news is that the upcoming changes are being implemented providing further protection for employees. If you feel that you are being treated unfairly at work for any reason then contact us.

Contact our experienced Employment Law Team on 0116 212 1000

A comparison – Sacked for a sandwich; Sacked for a chocolate

You may have seen recently online the story about a cleaner at a London law firm who was fired for eating a leftover sandwich. Single mother Gabriela Rodriguez was dismissed just before Christmas 2023 after her employer, a private contractor Total Clean, received a complaint from Devonshires Solicitors that leftover sandwiches were not being returned after meetings once the rooms were cleaned.

Sacked for a sandwich

Rodriguez had appealed the decision but Total Clean refused to reinstate her on the basis that “theft is theft” and because it did not want to upset Devonshires.

The law firm and the private contractor that employed Gabriela Rodriguez are being taken to an employment tribunal. The union representing the cleaner, claims her dismissal was discriminatory.

Petros Elia, the general secretary of UVW, said “Cleaners are routinely dismissed on trivial and, we argue, discriminatory grounds like this every day around the country. Many describe feeling treated ‘like the dirt they clean’ and Gabriela is one of them. We will raise our voices and unite to fight any employer – even big powerful companies like Devonshires Solicitors.” “We are taking both Total Clean and Devonshires Solicitors to an employment tribunal. For Total Clean, the claims are for unfair dismissal and direct race discrimination. For Devonshires Solicitors the claims are for direct and/or indirect race discrimination.”

The argument is if Gabriela Rodriguez were not Latinx and with limited English abilities, Devonshires Solicitors would not have complained about her, and she would not have been fired.

Whilst this decision does appear to be harsh, a comparison can be made with the case and decision of Mr Jason Galloway v Rentokil Initial UK Limited  – Case No: 1803158/2023

Sacked for a chocolate

Mr Jason Galloway worked for Rentokil as a technician in its pest control business. He has type 1 diabetes and was dismissed following an incident on 3 April 2023 at a customer’s premises when he took and ate a chocolate bar which did not belong to him.

After being suspended the Claimant visited the customer premises, taking with him two chocolate bars to replace that which he had taken, telling the customer’s manager of his diabetes. The customer then notified the Respondent and offered apologies, effectively withdrawing the complaint.

Following an investigation then a disciplinary meeting, it was held, ”One of our policies is that we do not tolerate theft. It is a gross misconduct offence, irrespective of previous warnings, this is serious enough to lead to dismissal. You had the opportunity but did not rectify this immediately after the incident occurring and you did not prepare correctly to avoid it occurring. You have admitted to theft and your actions have brought the company into disrepute. Throughout this hearing you have shown no remorse for your actions.”

At a Tribunal hearing, on 29th January 2024 Employment Judge Jennifer Wade stated that the “The Tribunal’s assessment is of whether the dismissal of the Claimant was appropriate and necessary, as a means of achieving the respondent’s aims, bearing in mind the very substantial impact upon him. The Tribunal took into account, in its assessment of whether dismissal was appropriate, the whole disciplinary process, including the appeal, which was reasonable and fair. We were satisfied that the Claimant had two opportunities to reassure the Respondent about the future, and he did not do so.” The Claimant’s disability discrimination claim was therefore dismissed.

Overview

Whilst at first glance the idea of being dismissed for a sandwich or a chocolate does appear harsh, each case has to be determined on their own facts. Jermey Vine also posted this online questioning whether it was fair for a cleaner to eat a leftover sandwich from a company meeting room worth about £1.50.

However, the decision in Galloway v Rentokil makes it clear that the value of the item is not relevant. The potential impact on a company’s reputation and the acts of employee after the incident and throughout meetings will determine the level of sanction to be implemented which can include a dismissal because ultimately ‘theft is theft’.

It will therefore be interesting to see how Gabriela Rodriguez’s claim proceeds and if it actually reaches a final hearing as the majority to claims are often settled by employers.

If you are an employer or an employee in need of legal advice, please contact our expert Employment Team who can help. Contact Us.