Menu

Settlement Agreements and future claims

Settlement agreements and future claims

Bathgate v Technip UK Ltd

This case ruled that unknown future discrimination claims cannot be compromised by a settlement agreement, which is restricted to complaints known to the parties at the time of settling.

It was found that employers and employees can settle statutory claims, such as claims for unfair dismissal and discrimination, by entering into a settlement agreement complying with the necessary statutory requirements. These include that the agreement must relate to ‘the particular complaint’ and that the employee must have received independent legal advice on the terms and effect of the agreement.

Settlement Agreement and Facts

Mr Bathgate worked as a Chief Officer for 20 years on various foreign-flagged ships outside the UK. In the final six months of his employment he had worked onshore in Scotland. Mr Bathgate took voluntary redundancy by way of Settlement Agreement in January 2017. Within the terms of this Settlement Agreement there was a term that provided for a future payment, to be calculated in accordance with the terms of a collective agreement which had been compiled prior to the introduction of age discrimination legislation.

Nevertheless, under the terms of the collective agreement, payments were prohibited to those aged 61 and over, provisions which self-evidently breached the age discrimination regulations. Those that were responsible for compiling the collective agreement had failed to update it to take account of this.

Mr Bathgate was unaware of the discriminatory provisions at the time of signing the Settlement Agreement. When the decision not to make the additional payment was communicated to him in June 2017, Mr Bathgate sought to bring an age discrimination claim. Although his employer accepted that age was the reason he was not paid the sum, it said that by signing the Settlement Agreement, Mr Bathgate had compromised his right to pursue any further claim. The Settlement Agreement stated that it constituted full and final settlement of the claims that Mr Bathgate ‘intimates and asserts’ against Technip, and listed various types of claim, including age discrimination claims under the Equality Act. The agreement also included a general waiver of ‘all claims … of whatever nature (whether past, present or future)’. The tribunal held that Mr Bathgate’s claim was precluded by the agreement. He appealed.

EAT decision

The appeal was allowed.

The fact that the age discrimination complaints had been referred to in the long list of claims being waived by Mr Bathgate did not mean that the particular age discrimination complaint had been identified in the Settlement Agreement.

The EAT was reinforced in this view by the fact that when similar Settlement Agreement provisions were introduced by s. 203 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, Parliament had indicated that Settlement Agreements should only be able to settle a particular complaint that has already arisen between the parties. In this instance, Mr Bathgate had signed away his right to claim age discrimination before he knew whether he had a claim or not. This is not permitted under the Equality Act. The words ‘the particular complaint’ do not encompass a potential future complaint. While such an interpretation may be inconvenient where both parties wish to avoid future claims, Parliament did not consider that a settlement of the sort seen in this case was desirable and it had legislated to prevent it.

Conclusion

Although this case is unusual on its facts, the fact is that Mr Bathgate did not know he had a claim for age discrimination until after he signed the Settlement Agreement and the payment was refused on the grounds of his age and therefore he was not prevented from bringing the claim.

If he had known he would not be paid it, then this would have been a different matter.

If you need assistance with creating Settlement Agreements in the right way, or understanding the total implications of signing a Settlement Agreement and the impact on your future obligations or choices, please contact Lawson West Solicitors. Contact Us.

Vaishali Thakerar

Family Law: Resolution Survey and Good Divorce Week

This week is Resolution’s national campaign called “GOOD DIVORCE WEEK”:

  • Lawson West Solicitors is supporting Resolution’s Good Divorce Week which highlights why the Government must support better advice for separating families

  • Exclusive research from Resolution lays bare the human suffering and cost caused by family court delays

  • Lawson West’s Family team is offering a fixed fee initial consultation appointment in respect of any new enquiries relating to any aspect of family law (divorce or other family issue) for £99 including VAT, during the week of 28 November to 2 December 2022.

Resolution is an organisation that represents over 6,500 family professionals, which helps people find a better way to divorce.

  • Divorces are on the increase again with the most recent statistics showing 113,000 divorces in 2021 – up nearly 10% on the previous year – and the impact on wait times is stark. On average it now takes 52 weeks to conclude divorce proceedings.
  • Official figures show that while private children cases were down by 7% during the last year, they are taking on average six weeks longer to reach a conclusion. And estimates suggest it takes nearly two years to resolve financial matters.

That leaves many families in limbo for over a year. That has a knock-on effect on children’s schooling and family finances.

Survey Results

Resolution surveyed its members on the current court backlogs and found:

  • 20% said court delays caused clients to rely on benefits
  • 34% said they’d referred a client to a counsellor or therapist to help them cope with the stress of ongoing court delays
  • 90% said court backlogs were causing additional and unnecessary stress and pressure for clients

Lawson West Family Solicitor Helen Shaw said: “Backlogs are wreaking havoc on local families in location. Even couples who want to separate amicably are having their patience and their continued relationship tested to breaking point by long delays. When it comes to sorting out children arrangements and finances after divorce, the situation is even bleaker.

“Children are waiting nearly a year for the courts to determine which parent they live with, what school they go to, how much time they spend with the other parent – putting the whole family’s life on hold. This is simply unacceptable and another reason why getting early professional advice is so important for families.

“We are proud to be offering a £99 30-minute advice session during Good Divorce Week so families get the benefit of early professional advice.”

Juliet Harvey, national chair of Resolution, said: “Under resourcing the family courts system is a false economy inflicting unnecessary pressure on the public purse and unconscionable stress on families at an already stressful time in their lives. A study of the impact of funding legal advice in Scotland found that, every £1 spent by government on legal aid in family cases saw a return of around £5 elsewhere.

“If the government were to focus more on encouraging early advice for separating couples and including information about all out of court options it could ease the pressure on family courts. Resolution members like Lawson West Solicitors are doing their best to help families achieve better outcomes and find long-lasting resolutions.”

NOTES:

  1. Resolution is a membership association of 6,500 family justice professionals promoting a non-confrontational approach to resolving family issues and campaigning for a fairer family justice system.

  2. Resolution members commit to a Code of Practice that promotes a constructive approach to family issues and considers the needs of the whole family, in particular the best interests of children.

  3. Further updates about Resolution’s work can be found via the official twitter handle: @ResFamilyLaw and on our website: www.resolution.org.uk

Employment: What are Settlement Agreements & How to Negotiate Them?

See our website pages on Settlement Agreements:

What is a Settlement Agreement?

Settlement Agreement FAQs

5 Points to Negotiate a Favourable Settlement Agreement

What is the Settlement Agreement process?

10-Step Guide for Employees Calculating Employment Settlement Agreements

What to expect in a Settlement Agreement? 

Implications of Restrictive Covenants

Ex-Gratia Payments in Settlement Agreements

Obtaining an Employee Reference in Settlement Agreements

 

Please see our Settlement Agreement Flowchart for more help on how to calculate your package.

Employment Settlement Agreement Process as screenshot

‘The Business Quiz’ – a big success !

 

Lawson West hosted a great quiz evening at Leicester Racecourse on Thursday 17th November in support of LOROS – “The Business Quiz“.

130 people in teams of 5 or 6 and local companies joined together to battle it out on general knowledge, music, sport, leisure, art and history. The fun evening included a ‘Build a Sculpture’ round, sponsored by The INK Group, using nothing but plastics cups, string and sellotape. The tallest sculpture was won by members of BNI Leicester Central.

As well as being part of the Leicester Business Festival [LBF], this important event was a fundraiser for LOROS and the LOROS events team was there on the night helping with score-keeping and a charity fundraising raffle. 

Together with ticket donations, raffle prize ticket sales, donations on the night and sponsorship donations, we managed to raise over £2,000 for LOROS Hospice, an important local charity. 

    • “Thank you again, you all worked so hard to make it a success, and to do all of this for LOROS means the world to everyone at the hospice. Warmest regards to everyone at Lawson West.”

The QuizMaster on the evening was the charismatic Chris Greenwell, who is also a trustee of LOROS. 

Well done to everyone who took part and well done to Mazars (The Maz-Artful Dodgers) who were the overall winners!  

quiz 1 quiz 3

quiz 2

 

 

The Leicester Business Festival event Business Quiz 2022