Menu

Property Auctions: Buyers Beware – Know Your Risks!

 

Many property purchasers attend auctions and get carried away with their bidding, however, they should be aware of the risks in purchasing property without first taking legal advice on the legal pack presented by the Seller.

Properties are often presented for sale at auction for a reason, possibly missing title, unadopted roads and sewers, or likely to suffer from environmental contamination. Often these defects are hidden in a raft of paperwork which would need to be deciphered in the round.

Buyers who have not taken advice may suffer difficulties and delays in selling their property or granting a mortgage over that same property later.  Lenders are becoming more stringent in their requirements to grant lending on properties, requiring that all regulations have been complied with before releasing their funds.  Although a property may seem compliant with a quick scan of a legal pack, this may not be the case.

Lenders are becoming more stringent in their
requirements to grant lending on properties,
requiring that all regulations have been
complied with BEFORE releasing their funds   

Beverley Heys, Commercial Property, Lawyer, Lawson West Solicitors, Leicester

Beverley Heys, Commercial Property Associate
Lawson West Solicitors, Leicester 

 

“It’s always worthwhile taking advice and if found that the property is not mortgageable or suitable for your purposes, then walking away from the purchase is the best course of action before you place your bid.

It is important to remember that if you buy at Auction, once that hammer falls you have just exchanged contracts and are committed to the purchase. Failure to complete breaches the contract and can bring significant penalties, usually including forfeiting the 10% deposit and any other fees paid out and perhaps even damages.

We have a specialist property team ready to advise you on all aspects of the legal title, we can check through the legal pack for you, before auction, and provide you with a summary of the legal issues so that you are armed with the knowledge you need to be secure in your investment decision.”

 

 

 

Leicester: Ms Omooba discrimination, breach of contract and harassment claim rejected

In local news, Seyi Omooba, 26, brought proceedings against Leicester’s Curve Theatre and her former agents for £128,000 after being dropped from a stage performance of The Color Purple.

It is reported that she had been due to play the lead character Celie, who is sometimes depicted as being in a lesbian relationship.

Ms Omooba was let go from the performance and dismissed after discovery of a Facebook post she had written in 2014 where she wrote “I do not believe you can be born gay, and I do not believe homosexuality is right, though the law of this land has made it legal doesn’t mean its right.”

Following her dismissal, Ms Omooba presented a claim for discrimination, harassment and breach of contract which was heard remotely at the Central London Employment Tribunal.  The Employment Tribunal panel was told she had been “unconditionally” offered her full salary for the role by the theatre but she refused, instead bringing legal action on the grounds she had suffered extensive career damage for espousing her religious beliefs.

At the tribunal she sought £4,309 from the theatre plus a further £25,000 for injury to feelings and reputational damage.  She also sued her former agency £98,752 for loss of earnings, future losses, injury to feelings and reputational damage.

All of her claims were rejected and dismissed by the Employment Tribunal panel.  It was concluded “the effect of the adverse publicity from [the 2014 post’s] retweet, without modification or explanation, on the cohesion of the cast, the audience’s reception, the reputation of the producers and ‘the good standing and commercial success’ of the production, were the reasons why she was dismissed”.

On the harassment claim, it said: “In the view of the tribunal Mr Stafford [Chris Stafford, Chief Executive of Leicester Theatre Trust] did not have the purpose of violating the claimant’s dignity or creating an intimidating or humiliating environment for her. His purpose was to save the production.”

Miss Omooba had claimed the character’s sexuality was ambiguous and she would have refused the role if she had considered her gay.  But this was rejected by the panel, with the panel commenting: “She had taken part in a similar production, she had the script, and knowing that a lesbian relationship was at least one interpretation, she should have considered much earlier whether a red line was to be crossed.”

Carrie-Ann Randall, Lawson West Solicitors Market Harborough

Carrie-Ann Randall, Employment Lawyer and Branch Manager of Lawson West Solicitors Market Harborough had this to say:

“The rules on discrimination are complicated and problematic.  Simply because Ms Omooba wrote a post expressing her beliefs does not automatically mean the Theatre’s dismissal of her would have been discriminatory.  Ms Omooba would need to demonstrate that she was treated less favourably “because of” one of the nine protected characteristics, sexual orientation being one of them. It could be said Ms Omooba had never raised her beliefs before, actively sought the role and would have continued in the role had it not been for the Theatre’s action in removing her.  Similarly, it was established she had been fully appraised of the facts connected with the character and their sexuality, at no time does there appear to have been a suggestion made to Ms Omooba that she shared the same sexuality, again making it difficult for Ms Omooba to suggest that she had been treated less favourably.

Claims of harassment require a person to demonstrate that they received unwanted conduct that has the purpose or effect of creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for the complainant, or violating their dignityClaims of this nature are rising in the Employment Tribunal as they are largely based upon those bringing the claim to show subjectively, their belief of suffering and do not require a comparator like other types of discrimination.”

 

How to Cope with Mental Health Symptoms

From stress, depression and anxiety, to phobias, grief and fears, we are all affected by mental health concerns at some point in our lives, to differing degrees. Sometimes poor mental health can affect our family or home relationships, our ability to care for loved ones, and it can also affect our performance at work, or all of these things. 

Read our useful list of Coronavirus mental heath symptoms and issues and ways that can help during the Pandemic or whilst Working From Home. Our list covers:

Coronavirus and Mental Health:

  • Stress and Anxiety

  • Mindfulness, including useful exercises

  • Fear and Anxiety

  • Fear of Infection – COVID-19

  • Agoraphobia

  • Stress, PDSD & PTSD

 

Useful links: 

Charity MIND

NHS & Mental Health

In a Leasehold noose? Leasehold reforms are coming…

 

Leasehold – Good News

In the past few weeks, Housing Secretary Robert Jenrick announced major reforms to English property law, giving around 4.5 million leaseholders the right to extend their leases to 990 years, with zero ground rents at more affordable prices.

Flat Ownership – Bad News

Flat ownership is fast becoming a sinking opportunity for landlords and property owners, with tenants more likely to forfeit on their rent due to coronavirus unemployment and an eviction ban on forfeiting tenants in place until 21 February, with the possibility of this being extended further if the lockdown is extended.

Coupled with the 2020 significant fall in flat sales due to the new responsibility of many owners having to replace cladding in blocks affected by the impact of Grenfell Tower disaster, all-in-all owning a leasehold flat, especially as an investment or second property is becoming less and less attractive.


Commonhold vs Leasehold

As Leasehold ownership status struggles to compete as an attractive buyer option, Commonhold tenure (meaning, in effect, that the freehold ownership is shared across occupants) is looking like the default tenure for the future. The leasehold reforms announced this month could mark the beginning of the end for the current restrictive leasehold system. 


What is Leasehold?

Leasehold is a form of ownership under which the property’s ultimate owner, the ‘freeholder’, extends a residential tenure to a ‘leaseholder’, which can last up to 999 years, with the leaseholder paying an annual service charge for maintenance of common areas, plus ground rent; and every year that passes, the value of the lease dwindles. Leases with less than 99 years left on them are unlikely to interest another leaseholder, so the lessee is often stuck with the leasehold property and can’t sell it or realise their initial leasehold purchase investment.


Houses and Leasehold

Leasehold tenure doesn’t just exist for flats. Many new homes on new housing estates have been sold under leasehold instead of freehold over the last ten years. New-build homes sold on a leasehold basis, with ground rents set at a few hundred pounds, but doubling every decade, have made houses worth far less than owners paid for them or simply unsellable compared to freehold properties.

Those that wanted to escape leasehold and buy the freehold of the house they live in, were offered freehold at inflated prices. Often the original builders sell-on whole estates of leasehold properties to property management companies who provide freehold purchase options for an extortionate profit, preferring instead to continue to reap the annual profits from maintenance fees and ground rent payments. The sale of new leasehold houses was banned in 2019, but many householders are affected by the effects, some unable to move home because of the unpalatable annual charges to new purchasers.


New Leasehold Legislation for 2022

Under new legislation, due to be passed by March 2022, leaseholders of flats and houses will be able to extend for 990 years, meaning they only have to do it once, and all post-extension ground rents will be zero. This will only apply to new and newly-extended leases. The government is to create an online calculator, standardising the cost of lease extensions or freehold purchases, and it will create a ‘commonhold council’ of representatives from leasehold groups, the housing industry and government to promote and prepare for the “widespread take-up of commonhold. The legislation will also see the cost of purchasing the freehold of a leasehold property fall substantially.

Rachael Mitchell, conveyancing, Lawson West Solicitors, Market Harborough

Rachael Mitchell, Head of Conveyancing at Lawson West Solicitors, Market Harborough:


“This new legislation will breathe a breath of fresh air and we will start to see more commonhold tenures and less restrictive leaseholds. Removing the current restrictions of owning a leasehold property will be happy news for many leaseholders who cannot move home because of high ground rents and maintenance charges, those who are stuck with their property because they have fewer years left on their existing lease, or those who simply can’t afford to buy the freehold. I welcome the new reforms which will make property owning fairer to millions of leaseholders.”