Menu

Worker Rights: Imminent Changes to Itemised Payslips  

 

New rights for all workers to itemised payslips will make payment more transparent and understandable

Payslips for all employees has been a legal requirement since the Employment Rights Act 1996 where a number of particulars were named as being required on all payslips. These include:

  • The gross amount of wages or salary
  • The amounts of any variable, fixed or other, deductions from that gross amount and the purposes for which these are made
  • The net amount of wages or salary payable
  • The method of payment

In February 2018, two new Orders were placed before Parliament which are set to change the requirements of information on payslips based on the contents of The Taylor Review, published in July 2017, in which recommendations were made to increase the rights of workers. The Orders placed before Parliament follow the recent response from the government to this Review, which, amongst other items, confirmed that they would be introducing legislation to extend the right to receive a payslip to all workers. This all-encompassing ‘workers’ umbrella includes those on casual and zero-hours contracts.

Changes to itemised payslips due to become lawful on 6th April 2019

Both Orders are due to come into force on the 6th April 2019. The first of these, passed on the 25th April 2018, named The Employment Right Act 1996 (itemised Pay Statement) (Amendment) Order 2018, will change the information required on an itemised payslip. The goal of the reform is that workers will have a clearer understanding of their pay, especially those who work varied hours which results in changeable pay, differing from period to period. The change will require payslips to state the number of hours that are being paid at which pay level, where pay varies dependent upon number of hours worked. This can either be shown as a summative number of hours worked, or as a breakdown for different types of work or rates of pay.

The second Order, named The Employment Right Act 1996 (itemised Pay Statement) (Amendment) (No. 2) Order 2018 will bring into force the government’s commitment, recently, to providing all workers, with written, itemised payslips- not just employees. This extension of rights to all workers enables all those in receiving payment to enforce their right to an itemised payslip in the Employment Tribunal.

The basis of these changes is, in particular, to provide transparency to the lower paid work force who will, from April 2019 onwards, be able to highlight incorrect payment structures and mistakes on payments.  There will also be a clearer ability to recognise if workers are not being paid correctly and in line with the Living Wage, as set out through the government’s proposal of transparency on pay for workers.

Does your business require support with the changes to The Employment Right Act 1996 (itemised Pay Statement) (Amendment)?

In light of these recent Orders, all employers with employees or workers who will also require itemised payslips, or changes to their existing payslips, should begin to review their pay statement practices. The new rules will apply to all work, or periods of work, which commence after the 6th April 2019.

If your business requires support through the imminent changes to itemised payslips, or for any other aspects of employment law, in the first instance, please contact Vaishali Thakerar at our Leicester office on 0116 212 1000 or by email to vthakerar@lawson-west.co.uk

 

Time to Review Employment Contracts?

Major changes to employment status are imminent. It is time to review contracts and assess business position in terms of employment law.

In the requirement to review employment contracts for all, we have reached the next stage in plans for the major shake-up of employment law, which began with the Taylor Review of Modern Working Practices- a review requested by the Prime Minister as a reaction, in part, to the growth of the UK’s gig economy.

The gig economy is a colloquial phrase defining a labour market which in recent years has been characterised by the increase and prevalence of short-term contracts, freelance work, outsourced or non-contracted work. The gig economy provides polar opposite outputs depending upon your viewpoint; employment that offers flexibility with regard to employment hours, or employee exploitation with no or little workplace protection. Whatever your point of view, the gig economy is substantial and growing; It is estimated that there are over 5 million people who are employed in this capacity, where rather than receiving the wage and benefits of an ‘employee’ they are paid for the ‘gigs’ they perform- such as a delivery, a shift or a project.

4.8 Million self-employed individuals are likely to be affected

Ten months after Mathew Taylor published his report into modern work, the government are beginning to act on the findings. The time taken to respond has meant that the thoughts have been gathered, comprehensive and offer significant reforms to employment law as opposed to what could have been knee-jerk reactions to a report which found gross injustice for the lowest paid workers in our communities. With over 4.8 million self-employed individuals likely to be in some way affected by the changes, a sober, considered response should be celebrated.

It is prudent, in the present climate, to assess the robustness of employment contracts and to ensure that they reflect the roles and job descriptions of employees accurately, through a review process by business owners, directors or HR Managers.

In an ideal world, all contracts, job descriptions, terms and conditions should be reviewed during the recruitment process as a position is advertised and filled. Decisions about the capabilities of an individual and the types of work to be completed can then be decided by the organisation in advance of the individual started in post, thus mitigating the chance of friction in the future; correctly matching applicant to appropriate job role.

The exclusion of Employment Tribunal fees and case law brought against high profile companies such as Uber and City Sprint, as well as the changing landscape around employment status, have increased the likelihood of employment disputes. In addition, the culture of blame vrs claim which engulfs much of the engagement with social disagreement has charged many psyches with a need to attribute blame and look for compensation.

That said, when we talk of employment rights, some of the findings of The Taylor Review brought to light utterly atrocious situations for many of those in the lowest paid positions in the UK.

The Economic Reality Test

When it comes to checking and reviewing the contracts of existing employees, it is vital that workers are correctly classified. One of the most robust forms of validation is the use of the economic reality test which assesses employment status through six factors:

  1. Is the work integral to the business?
  2. What is the permanency of the worker’s relationship with the company?
  3. What level of investment have the worker and employer made in tools and equipment for the worker to carry out the tasks of their role?
  4. How much control over work, hours, projects and contract does the worker have?
  5. What is the worker’s opportunity for profit and loss?
  6. What skill level is required to carry out the required role?

Risk assessing your employment contracts and the type of work each type of employee or worker undertakes is important but should be handled with extreme care. Conducting a full audit of the workforce by companies who believe that their existing practices may fall short of requirements as the landscape changes, will enable gap analyses and thus action plans to be developed once any discrepancies are highlighted. Ignoring the issue really isn’t an option.

Although assessment is likely to be a costly process for many businesses, the benefits far outstrip the risks or costs. Potential Tribunals, settlement agreements, penalties from the HMRC and closer to home, the workforce voting with their feet, pose far greater potential losses than the cost of risk assessing contracts.

If your business requires support through the risk assessment and review of your employment contracts, terms and conditions, or for any other aspects of employment law, in the first instance, please contact Vaishali Thakerar at our Leicester office on 0116 212 1000 or by email to vthakerar@lawson-west.co.uk.

 

 

£33m due in refunded Employment Tribunal Fees

The Government have recently stated that they will actively contact all potential claimants who are yet to request a refund on Employment Tribunal fees paid out during the 4-year period from July 2013.

The Employment Tribunal refund scheme opened on the 16th November 2017. The scheme enabled those who were charged fees to take a tribunal to court between the 29th July 2013 and 26th July 2017 to apply for a refund.

Employment Tribunal fees were introduced by the Ministry of Justice’ then Lord Chancellor Chris Grayling, in July 2013. Charges began at £160 and increased to between £230 and £950 for further hearings. Some claimants were required to pay up to £1,200. Since inception, trade union Unison challenged the fees, through all levels of the justice system, culminating in a landmark Supreme Court ruling, which last year, outlawed the fees. The fees were found to be unlawful on the grounds that it prevented access to justice and was ‘indirectly discriminatory on the grounds of sex.’

Dramatic fall in volume of claims after Employment Tribunal fees were introduced 

Unison reported that there was a ‘dramatic and persistent’ fall in the number of claims after the fees were introduced- over 70% in litigation cases, with the decline more apparent in lower value or non-monetary claims.

In October 2017, 1000 claimants completed a refund application in order to test the system. Once successfully completed, the applications were opened to all those who had been charged a fee during the circa 4 years of existence. 

It was expected that hundreds of thousands of claims would be received with an estimated refunds cost of £33m, to include 0.5% interest. In December 2017, soon after the scheme launch, the former Ministry of Justice member, Dominic Raab suggested that the government would not write to potential claimants as ‘often people moved home’. At this point, 3,400 payments had been made, with a value of £2.8m, only 8.5% of the expected full amount of due refunds.

Further action is necessary to reach ALL potential claimants 

Until recently, the government had relied upon the information being displayed on government channels such as the gov.uk website. However, in a letter to the House of Commons Justice Committee, published in early May 2018, Justice Secretary David Gauke stated that the refund scheme was making ‘reasonable progress’ but that ‘further action was necessary’. He continued by stating that ‘We are therefore writing over the next few months to everyone who paid an ET fee, but who has not yet applied for a refund, to raise awareness of the existence of the scheme, and providing details on how to apply’.

The first 2,000 letters are reported to have been sent on the 9th April.

The refunds are available for anyone who brought a claim personally and paid fees on their own behalf, or anyone who paid a fee on someone else’s behalf- such as a trade union or insurance company. Additionally, the fee refund will be available for any organisation ordered during the Tribunal proceedings to pay a claimant’s fees.

The letter from Mr Gauke continues to state that the government has incurred legal fees in access of £305,000 during the dispute with further costs expected to settle the costs incurred by Unison which the Supreme Court ordered to be paid. With wider implications to the way courts and tribunals are funded, the Ministry of Justice continues to seek legal advice.

Individuals who paid directly for their own fees who believe they are eligible for a refund in Employment Tribunal fees, should make their application online, as long as they have not changed name since the claim, the claim was brought against a single employer and the claimant has a UK bank account. Should you require assistance with this Lawson West are able to assist.

Do you require support for an employment issue?  

If you require any support through an employment issue, are looking for advice or believe you have grounds for an Employment Tribunal claim, in the first instance contact our employment team on 0116 212 1000 or 018585 445480 for a free initial consultation, during which we will be able to suggest the most appropriate course of action for your situation. Alternatively complete our contact form and we will contact you directly.

Divorce Law: How Easy is it to get divorced?

Does divorce law need updating?

Divorce Law in England and Wales is now over 50 years old.  Couples seeking a divorce must spend at least two years separated or one must blame the other for the breakdown of the marriage citing either the adultery or the unreasonable behaviour of the other.  Even if both parties agree that the relationship is over, a divorce cannot be obtained on the basis of “irreconcilable differences” as is often thought.  So even in those circumstances if a couple wishes to avoid waiting two years from the date of separation before commencing divorce proceedings, one must blame the other.

Resolution, the organisation for family lawyers and other family law professionals nationwide and which has about 6,500 members is committed to changing divorce law to make divorce easier.  This could easily be achieved by changing the law to introduce no fault divorce. 

This may sound controversial and contrary to the views of many who believe that marriage is for life. However, unfortunately the reality is that for many people their marriage does not last and divorce is difficult enough, often dealing with issues surrounding children and the family finances, without having to apportion blame for the breakdown of the marriage in a legal document.  In any event who is to blame for the breakdown of the marriage (and often there is a portion of blame on both parties) does not have any impact on the decisions that the Court might make in relation to children and financial matters.

A divorce which is based on adultery or unreasonable behaviour can therefore create conflict when none previously existed or make worse a situation in which there is already a significant amount of bad feeling.

Proposed changes to the Law

It is the view of many family lawyers that by removing the need to blame the other party in the divorce process will increase the chances of successful non-court dispute resolution regarding children and financial matters.  What is proposed is a new divorce procedure where one or both parties can give notice that the marriage has broken down irretrievably. The divorce can then proceed and after a period of six months, if either or both parties still think that they are making the right decision, the divorce can be finalised.

James Haworth, Director in charge of the Family Law Department at Lawson West agrees that the approach of Resolution, of which he is a member, is correct.  “I believe that removing fault from divorce will assist parties to resolve their disputes in a less confrontational manner.  It will not result in more divorces as some fear although it will not help every case.  However, any step which helps to reduce the conflict in what is an extremely traumatic and difficult time, must be welcomed”. 

Seeking Professional Advice on Family Law

If you are looking for advice on family law, please do not hesitate to contact Lawson West. Lawson West are a national provider of expert family law advice with a wealth of experience in this field and welcome a discussion with you regarding your circumstances and potential claim. Initial no-obligation appointments costing £100 +VAT are available.

Please contact us on  0116 212 1000or 01858 445 480, alternatively fill out a contact formon our website, and we will get in touch as soon as possible.  The team is happy to arrange a meeting at a time and location that suits you.